About Me

Name: skep41
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Misunderstood MoveOn

This is an except from a moveon.org member's e-mail to Dean Barnett at Hughhewitt.com.

"It was the Right that resorted to unbelievable vitriol and sliming in the Clinton administration and haven't stopped since. How different is the MoveOn ad from The Swift Boat campaign against Kerry? And have you heard Ann Coulter lately? I mean if you strip away the content, the insulting, demeaning and ad hominem attacks are certainly not limited to the left. But because we have no voice in the media (yeah, yeah, I know, but the MSM is actually very mainstream and resolutely corporate and representative of those interests) our tactics need to respond accordingly. Such is that way of a robust democracy, which thank goodness we still are."

This is delusional. The Swift Boat ads were completely accurate. The vast majority of the men in the company that Kerry served in supported them. He received three Purple Hearts and didnt spend one day in the hospital. No one, American or VC, was killed or wounded in these 'battles'. Kerry was apparently the only casualty. After his tour of duty was cut short by his three Purple Hearts he returned to testify to the Senate about the bloodthirsty animals, reminding one of Genghis Khan! that he was forced to serve with. Senator Kerry has never responded to the charges made and refuses to release his military records.
General Petraeus is not a traitor as alleged in the ad ; the Swift Boat ads were accurate and MoveOn.Org's canard against the leader of our army on the field of battle is a vicious lie.
The Right never called Clinton a Nazi or a retard or any of the thousand other epithets that are daily hurled at President Bush. Happening to notice Bill Clinton's many departures from the truth, his association with criminals and foreign intelligence services, the fact that he committed perjury under oath on national TV in an especially disgusting sexual harassment case ( where the complainant was described by minion James Carville as "What you get when you drag a twenty-dollar bill through a trailer park on the end of a fishline.") and disagreeing with his big government philosophy are not sliming or vitriol. There is no 'Right Wing' War Room, that concept was invented by the Clintons. The idea that they are helpless victims of irrational anger, and that the left has no voice in the national media when they ARE the national media is laughable. The Clinton's have used their close association and ideological brotherhood with the media to avoid answering any questions about their activities.
Poor James Carville, Lonnie Davis and Sid Blumenthal. Such nice people and those vicious Right-Wingers made up such terrible things about them. History will show the honesty, sincerity and dignity of the Clinton Administration. While us hate-filled ideologues were wringing slime and insults from our fevered brows the other side was turning the other cheek, with a tear in their eye for their misguided brethren. Yes, the left did offer some helpful, mild and constructive criticism of President Bush but if paranoid neocons want to take respectful terms such as Nazi lying babykiller fascist pig murderer as negative than what can a rational person do? An 'effective' full-page ad calling the leader, successful leader, of our troops in the field against a dangerous enemy a traitor was only to help make him a better general.
Sometimes I prefer the left to foam with invective. Its more true to who they are. They are trying to destroy this country. The Clinton Administration was the most corrupt in American history. Although they weren't the most incompetent its only because they had a Republican congress to turn aside their most errant follies. In foreign policy they were a total disaster.
Now someone from a website which has been proud to run the most vile anti-semitic slurs and actually advocates policies that would lead to the death of millions of Jews in Israel is presenting himself and his ilk as ill-used victims. He denies that they are anti-capitalist (or does he?) and states that they're just plain folks. Fine. So are we.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hate Speech

I just read a column by Ann Coulter "From The Halls Of Malibu To The Shores Of Kennedy' in which she stoops to irony, sarcasm, and a factual narrative chronicling the Democrats' previous nonsensical positions during the course of the war in Iraq. She refuses to except the wise position and analysis of the New York Times as a given and descends into the pit of hatred from there.
Recounting the Democrats previous positions is hate speech. Backing it up with specific examples is a hate-filled diatribe, a genre for which Anne Coulter is well known. Siding with Nazi Bush and the neocons against the legitimate hopes of a few misunderstood militants shows a level of disgusting cultural ethnocentricity that is certain to make Ms. Coulter's more unstable readers dislike our misunderstood friends from the Third World and use the rascist slur 'terrorists' to describe their just response to a world gone mad with Global Capitalism.
Cant we all just get along? Now we're supposed to cheer some 'general' because he's 'winning' a war when the money we've wasted on this colonial enterprise could be much better spent subsidizing the Democrats' campaign contributors. What about the Children. Are useless pronouncements about 'progress', however accurate, going the make their lives any better? So keep fulminating your rage and obloquy Anne, us sane people know that the way to overcome a murderous opponent is to lay down your arms and negotiate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Low We've Sunk

I've just watched the You-tube clip of a ten minute rant by National Embarrassment Bob Wexler at the House Foreign Affairs Committee show-trial of General Petraeus. I am ashamed that my country contains people that would elect a person like Wexler to Congress. He had more dignity defending the rape, sexual harassment and perjury of BJ than he does sniveling and yodeling for America's defeat by the Islamonazi terrorists. Isnt it funny that the worse Congressmen represent the richest districts; Wexler, Nadler, Pelosi, Waxman, McDermott and a rogue's list of the dumbest, smuggest, most anti-American traitors come from silk-stocking upscale districts. The professors in the most prestigious universities have done their work well, the minds of our executives and professionals have been effectively poisoned against our country and our way of life. These show-trials of the good general are a symptom of the rot at the very top of our society. These morons have the most to lose. Luckily there seem to be a few elements of society with an instinct for self-preservation.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Letter To My Congressman

Yes, I was so outraged at the treatment of Gen. Petraeus by the House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats yesterday that I wrote to my Congressman. Unfortunately my Congressman is the Stalinist woodchuck Henry Waxman. Now, Mr. Waxman was somewhere else yesterday, no doubt cooking up some new plot to destroy the economy or support the terrorists, but his heart was with the moveon.org ad entitled 'Gen. Petraeus or Gen. Betray-us'. Its disheartening to see a major political party sink so low. At what point do the dummies that vote for them catch on to how disgraceful and disgusting the Democrats truly are? It seems that the Republicans are beginning to catch on and FIGHT! Duncan Hunter did himself proud. John Boehner as well. Where's Rudy, Mitt and Fred?
Anyway I wrote to Representative Waxman (and inadvertently dumped the text off the clipboard) and  remarked that if the left could question the  patriotism of the General in  the field commanding our troops then wasn't it about time to start questioning the patriotism of those who don't support the troops, the mission or our  country?  I also said that even in this gerrymandered nightmare of a left-wing district, if the reality of his views were known, even Cong. Waxman could be defeated. I pray for that day. The day that the 'default Democrats', those people who mindlessly vote for Democrats but don't follow politics enough to  understand what they're supporting, catch on to the nefarious vision that these Socialist Democrats are leading us towards the Democrats will be finished. Someday, some Republican with enterprise and imagination will take the war to the enemy in their so-called 'safe' districts and whip them. Today Gen. Petraeus will be on trial in the Kangaroo Kourt of the Senate where the big-league posers and morons live. Fie on them.

Well, well ,well. Cong. Waxman's computer auto-answered my letter and pasted the text of it into the auto-reply (which thanked me for my views and invited me to check out the website).
So here it is:

Dear Congressman Waxman,
I know that you didnt attend the Foreign Affairs Committee meeting yesterday but I have no doubt that your heart was with Tom Lantos and the others who yearn and work for the defeat of our country in the War On Terror. The Democratic Party is wallowing in shame and disgrace in its advocacy of defeat. You dont support the mission, you dont support the troops, you dont support our country. If your allies can question the patriotism of the General who is leading our troops in the field (General Betray-us according to your pals at Moveon.org) isnt it legitimate  for those of us who actually support the mission, the troops and the country to question the patriotism of those of you who dont? Its lucky for you that the Republican Party hacks in California are too stupid to give you any effective opposition because even in this gerrymandered left-wing district, if the reality of your views were known, you could be defeated.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

For The Children!

The Right Wing Attack Machine is dancing with joy because their stereotyping of all Asians as agents of Chicom intelligence has resulted in the arrest of Norman Hsu in Colorado, before he could scoot across the border and head for Beijing. He probably was visiting one of his non-existent textile factories to reassure the people he doesnt employ before leaving the Land Of Compassion. Just because another creep with Chicom connections and no visible means of support has been nailed after giving millions in bundled donations to The Party That Cares About The Children we can all be thankful that it wasnt Jack Abramhoff giving Really Evil money to the Culture Of Corruption Republicans. Now we have to note whether these oh-so-shocked Friends Of The Children are donating just Hsu's donations or the bundled donations that Hsu generated from the Chicoms to worthy charities like the Clinton Lie-Berry Fund For Untraceable Cash. Hey, either way The Children win. It takes a village to bundle Commie Cash and who better to launder it than the Chinese?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stench Of Corruption

R. Emmet Tyrell wrote a column today giving a seamless narrative of the purchase of the Clints by Chicom intelligence, with an emphasis on the latest shenanagans by the Hsu's and the Paws.
How can the Repubs not be making any noise about this? Are these guys completely brain-dead? This is an opportunity to connect with the Republican base like no other, we all hate and fear the Clinton's for just this reason; they will bring a collection of sleazy Socialist criminals into the Executive Branch and destroy this country. If they were ever to stand up to the Chicoms (an unlikely scenario) couldnt Hu Jintao just produce Hsu, Chung and Trie at a press conference in Beijing? A real blackmail possibility. The Democrats cant possibly be stupid enough to invest their hopes in these sleazy Clintons. And why are the Republicans having debates where they're not screaming and demanding an explanation from Mrs. Sleazeball? The Repub theme should be 'Stench Of Corruption' and they should be shouting this from the rooftops. Instead they're arguing amongst themselves about trivia. A bought-and-paid-for agent of Chicom intelligence is running for president and the opposition party doesnt seem to notice. Whichever candidate announces and makes a major speech demanding that Dragon Lady come clean will win himself a place in the hearts of Repub primary voters. The warroom generated firestorm of reaction from the Clintonista sock-puppets and their bum-crawling toadies in the drive-by media will bring this to the attention of even the most befuddled Oprah viewer. Which of our candidates is going to show the cajones needed to take on America's bitter enemies-- starting with Chicom Hilly and her perjuring, rapist husband.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Drop Dead Fred

So Fred Thompson made his big announcement last night.  Mary Kay Hamm on Townhall talked about the color scheme of the set he was on. I guess that says it all. There is no there there. He's like Cunegonde in 'Candide', by the time he's ready to say yes he's too old and ugly for it to matter. This country should be sick of posers trying to emote their way into the presidency. The Dems have the worst batch but only a few of the Repubs have any gravity or accomplishment. Giuliani foremost, but McCain has a long, solid record (a liberal one but its there); even Duncan Hunter has stood up for his principles in a rational way, as has Tancredo (although neither of these two has much of a record of accomplishment or leadership); the rest are a bunch of schleppers, posing and preening and pandering. We cant gamble on an unknown against the Clintons.
Anyway, since Thompson has a TV candidacy I reviewed him like a TV critic:

If we're going to play TV critic games (and we might as well with a candidate with no administrative or substantial political experience like this one) than lets act like a casting director after an audition.
"Hmmm. Style's ok but he's too ugly." If I want a liberal pretending to be conservative I would cast KenDoll Mitt Romney for the role of 'exciting new face on a presidential candidate'. Fred looks like an old frog. I keep thinking of 'Oh Brother Where Art Thou', "Them sireens turned Pete into a toad!" when I see this guy. Dumping the debate for Leno underlined what a lightweight he is. Up against Dragon Lady, day after day in this endless campaign, he will turn off every swing voter in the country with his baggy eyes, barrel-like physique and infundibulum jowls. Fred had his boomlet but then wasnt able to turn himself into a brand people trust and want to choose over the others. Partly its just his sheer lack of any political accomplishment or substance but also that he doesnt have a theme people can rally to. His entry in the debate last night-- a stiff, formless and forgettable paid spot gave him  a presence that accented his inability to get on the playing field. If the ad had attacked Hillary Clinton's Chicom cash and reminded us how high the stakes were and saluted the other debaters it might have worked but it turned out to be a big,fat nothing. I hope he hasnt burned his bridges at 'Law And Order'. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Enough With The Gimmicks

So Fred Thompson isnt going to debate but he'll run an ad during the debate. Aint that ducky?
Who is this buffoon anyway? We've got to step back from the day-to-day political game and ask ourselves what we really know about any of these guys and whether we know them well enough to trust them at such a critical moment. Not just what they say but what they've done and how they've behaved in the past. Do we now award the Presidency to the candidate with the cleverest media strategy? What has Howard Baker's protege actually DONE in his life that would give us any confidence in his rhetoric? I like bold, conservative statements as much as the next guy but we've had a phoney 'compassionate conservative' in the White House for the last seven years and have had to eat alot of crow while he expanded the welfare state mightily and handed out goodies to all his Chamber Of Commerce business buddies. Let's not get screwed again by some slickly packaged unknown quantity. The only candidates running this year who have been promenantly in the public eye long enough to have shown, by their actions, what kind of leader they would be are Rudy Giuliani and (God help us) Hillary Clinton. The rest could be anything, and we've had twenty years of damage to our country by chiseling, self-agrandizing, big government incompetents from both parties. Let's not risk it again.   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Same Dopes

Robert Novak wrote a column today about how despondent and depressed the Republican hacks in the Washington political industry are about their future election prospects. It points out the state that the hapless GW Bush has left the party. These guys should be picking out conservative, take-no-prisoners candidates and going for a fifty-state assault against the Dems-- everywhere, starting today. Local money should stay local instead of being shifted around the country to favored lackeys. A winning team has a winning mentality.
All the 'experts' should put down their polling data,stop running focus groups and get out there and FIGHT!. The Republican Party is not making a case for itself that the American people can understand... and not just in the targeted districts that they think might be vulnerable. I watched DiFi run a totally brain-dead campaign for Senate in '06, with absolutely NO effective opposition. Nobody raised her hubby's defense contracts (while she was voting to cut funds off for our army in the field) or any of her whacky, terrorist-supporting actions. A good candidate could have beaten her in this supposedly Democratic state. But because all the geniuses in Washington decided to back losers like Lincoln Chafee there was no campaign out here. There was no campaign against Ben Nelson of Nebraska, a left-wing liberal in a conservative state; probably because he sucked up to President Bush on a couple of votes. Why didnt someone lay down the law to chuckleheads like Max Baucus in Montana and Kathleen Harris in Florida and put in some decent candidates? Is somebody going to suggest to Ted Stevens that he drive over the 'bridge to nowhere', park his car and stay there, before we lose that one. We need a national campaign AGAINST government-run health-care NOW! Not just to stop an obvious wrong turn but to unite the party around a theme we all agree on and to communicate to the rest of the people-- the default Democrats-- that there is an alternative to the slide towards Euro-trash Socialism.
In short, the apparatchiks that run the party lack vision, imagination and courage. They are not political entrepreneurs but time-serving parasites. We cant win with a team like that. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ginko Baloba

 toI wrote this to comment on an article by Salene Zito  titled, "Ex-Adviser To McCain Says He Deserves A Second Look From Voters'. That was followed by a column filled with inside-the-organization gossip and not one reason why any conservative (aka Republican base voter) should give this guy a second look. The failure of George W. Bush and guys like McCain to advocate and produce any results on a myriad of issues important to conservatives has pointed out the necessity of remembering actions and not listening to the campaign jive. If important Republicans dont start standing up for our principles then forget it, the party is going to die and this country will continue its slide towards Euro-feebleness.
My Comment:

Ginko Baloba
Its a miracle root, one that people use when their memory starts to fail. You know, when you cant remember how this guy SCREWED us with the 'Gang Of Fourteen'. Remember, Republicans had a majority in the Senate for four years and I dont recall us Republican primary voters getting a single thing that we elected these guys for,in many instances because this 'maverick' stood in the way. Casting one's mind back I seem to remember Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the guy who planned and organized 911, who Senator McCain, if memory serves me right, wants to give an ACLU lawyer to so his Islamonazi mug wont have to answer any rudely-phrased questions about his associates. Cant you remember things like McCain-Kennedy (letting LaRaza And MALDEF write our immigration laws) and McCain-Feingold's partial repeal of the First Amendment? Salena, you should take this miracle root, available at most health-food stores, so you will remember the most important thing, THIS GUYS A LIBERAL!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is This A Free Country?

Recently there have been generic TV ads by some left-wing foundation demanding that the California Legislature 'Do Something' about the health-care 'crisis'. I guess by crisis they mean that poor people are stuck getting free but less-than-the-best service from overpressed county authorities while the majority of insured middle-class people have much shorter wait times and access to a wider variety of services. Asking the confused Marxist hippies and rabid Mexican nationalists who compose the California Legislature to stick their noses into running the state's health care system is to sneer in the face of death. These idiots will kill us in the name of Fairness.
Today there was an article on Townhall about the Canadian system, and the many Canuks who come south for medical care that is readily available here. The ongoing collapse of all these panacea free health care systems is as certain as it is predictable. Nationalizing industries never works.

Here's My Comment:

Is This A Free Country? If this is a free country then where's all my free stuff? Or, to put it in the words of one of our local TV newscasters during the HillaryCare debate in the mid-90's, "Free Healthcare, how much will it cost?"
We've now had a century of governments nationalizing industries in the name of fairness and the results are always the same; scarcity, much higher costs, preferred access for the well-connected, and an end to innovation. Anyone who can look at the results of the many national-government health systems around the world and still be in favor of nationalization is a fool. Unfortunately if you attach the word 'free' to anything these days the hogs will come arunnin. This debate is just the Democrats yelling, "Sooooey!" and banging on the swill bucket. Reasoned arguments will have no effect, after all, its a Free Country, isnt it?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Chicom Cash

Uh-Oh! For once its MRS Clinton that's been caught with her pants down. Some joker named 'Hsu' (sounds like the 'shoe' that Larry Craig rubbed against the policeman he was trying to have sex with) turns out to be a shady criminal.  Turns out that he just won a free one-way ticket to Beijing and accommodations right next door to Tommy Chung and Charley Tree. Mrs. C is 'shocked,shocked that shady cash has found its way into her coffers and is so choked with remorse that she is going to donate it to charity; my guess is the BJ Clinton Double-Wide Lie-Berry and Massage Parlor Foundation For Untracable Cash, or some other equally deserving entity.
Here's the comment I left on Townhall:
I love how these guys with a $45,000 annual income are able to make $35 million in political donations in three months. Reminds you of the vow-of-poverty Buddhist nuns and James Riady's gardener doesnt it? Fortunately for the Chicom's favorite female Democratic candidate the Republicans are too busy wringing their hands about Larry Craig bumping his shoe against a plainclothes policeman to worry about trivia like this. While these left-wing creeps are taking hundreds of thousands of dollars in shady donations they yell, "Culture Of Corruption" and the Republican Party just lays there like a stunned mullet, never seizing the initiative. And you cant blame this one on a biased media either, they broke the story, so now where is the group of Repub Senators on the Capitol steps yelling for an investigation and even empaneling an investigative committee? Which Senators are scheduling themselves on the Sunday blab shows to talk about Her Thighness's shady Chicom connections?
This story also points out that there is no serious opposition to Mrs. BJ Clinton in the Democratic party. Her so-called opponents for the nomination are nowhere to be found on this one, empty suits all. With opposition like this will any young female be safe within the Beltway after Jan 20, 2009? I doubt it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who's The Schlemiel?

This was written as a comment on Townhall to respond to a Jonah Goldberg article attacking Alberto Gonzales as he resigns. I feel Gonzales is a result of a much larger problem-- the almost-total lack of leadership ability of one George W. Bush. Here is what I wrote:

My father once explained two Yiddish terms to me:
A schlemazl is the guy who knocks the can of paint off the window sill, the schlemeil is the hapless boob who gets splashed with the falling paint. Bush is the schlemazl. Gonzales is the hapless boob who was the victim of Bush's inability to confront his enemies. In the name of comity Bush has egged on the claque of left-wing creeps in the Senate who are devoted to his destruction. If Bush had directed the Justice Department to investigate Harry Reid's land deals,Chuck Schumer's credit checks, DiFi's hubby's defence contracts and a host of other scandals the situation would be quite different. If they're going to attack him for having a 'political' Justice Department than why not have one? Now he gets attacked for it while the Dems skate away free.
Conservatives always talk about media bias but if the media were given a hot, juicy investigation of a Democratic Senator they would report it. All we see are the Repubs cowering, waiting for the next media attack without realizing that you can seize the initiative and write the story for the media to report. Bush,the schlemazl, never got that. He never understood about intra-party discipline or how to confront his political opponents-- or even who his political opponents are (he's attacked his base more often than he's attacked the Dems). So now Sad Sack Gonzales, dripping with paint, goes to spend more time with his family. Another humiliating defeat for we conservatives who have been cursed with such a feckless leader. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No More Clintons

Today John Hawkins wrote a column on TH 'Eight Reasons Why Conservatives Must Defeat Hillary'. My immediate quarrel was with the title-- Shouldnt it have been 'Eight Of The Many Reasons...etc'. Their incompetence is total, their corruptions legion, their ablity to spout lies layered on lies is unmatched. If we have to listen to any more fables of the Goldwater Girl donating time to minister to the needs of illegal aliens in her wealthy Chicago suburb I think I'll puke. If people are going to reelect these two pukes then they should stop complaining about corruption and dishonesty in government-- they are getting what they want.
Here is my posted response to the column:

That short paragraph on corruption failed to mention one of the most egregious examples of the Clint's corruption in office-- their relationship with the Chicoms.The Clints took millions from the Chicoms and millions from the Loral corporation. Shortly after this occurred embargoed missile-aiming technology was transferred to the Chinese. Read 'Year Of The Rat'.
Now Her Royal Thighness is flying around the country in a jet owned by Vin Gupta, a piece of human refuse who's business includes selling phone lists of 'vulnerable' senior citizens to telephone rip-off artists. The lovely and delightful Bill Jefferson (BJ) sits on the board of this company and has collected millions for his work.
The paragraph also didnt mention the Clinton Double-Wide Lie-Berry and Massage Parlor in Little Rock, a conduit for unreported 'donations' from criminals and foriegn governments.
In a paragraph that apparently slipped John Hawkins mind (the ninth reason) is BJ's career birddoggin babes and bangin beaver. Belinda Stronach and the divorcee down the street at Chappaqua are just a couple that have made it into the press recently. Havent we subjected ourselves to this national disgrace enough already? Doesnt  Hilly's supervision of the 'Bimbo Eruptions' intimidation team disqualify her for any public office?
How about her 250+ 'I Dont Remember's when she testified in front of the Grand Jury in Castel Grande (subpoenaed billing records found in her office after the statute of limitations had passed).
I could go on. There are a thousand reasons not to put these two creeps back in office. Lets hope the Oprah watchers and other mental defectives dont overwhelm us (with a few hundred thousand phony ballots added in in key districts) and hand power back to these two nefarious incompetants.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just Another Gimmick

I clicked on R. Emmet Tyrell's article on Townhall about the idiots who contributed the questions on the 'YouTube Debate'. Mr. Tyrell focused on the morons who asked the questions. That's all well and good but the bigger issue, I think, is why do Democrats NEVER have to answer serious questions? They wag their jaws spewing whatever  the polls at the moment tell them is popular with whatever demographic segment they happen to be speaking to and whatever  they say, no matter how irrational, is unanalyzed and forgotten in  time for the next bit of nonsense to emerge. Their true actions are never scrutinized honestly.
Here's my comment to Mr. Tyrell's article:

You Tube or any other MSM format becomes a vehicle for the Democratic candidates to avoid any serious questions. Mrs Clinton's relationship with a creep who sells lists of vulnerable senior citizens to con artists, no question there. The unbroken record of failure of government health-care systems, didnt hear that one. The Democrats opposition to a border fence, nope. The Dem's opposition to the John Doe law, didnt hear it. Any question about the use of an increasingly discredited man-made Global Warming theory to justify government control of the economy, nah- not there. They could have asked why Democrats run as conservatives and then go to Washington and vote like wacko leftists, but they didnt. Nuclear power, building refineries and drilling for oil? nope. Fortunately for the Dems, the Republicans, for some inexplicable reason, are also too befuddled to hit them with those same questions (and a whole lot more). The Repubs just stand on the cattle call stage and respectfully answer snidey questions about abortion.
The media is the problem. The idiots that are running it have no interest in serious debate. They are morons with an agenda pandering to morons with an agenda. Result-- Dennis Kucinich, Hillary Clinton and B. Hussien Obama are considered serious candidates.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive