Posted by
skep41 on Thursday, June 04, 2009 2:46:59 PM
In
1945 an ailing president, who never should have been elected to a
fourth term, negotiated a treaty at Yalta that betrayed our British
allies and turned over to a dictator who was as brutal as Hitler half
of a continent. Stalin, who had proven himself a craven coward in his
negotiations and alliance with Hitler had no fear of the capitalist
democracies. FDR was more concerned about British colonialism than he
was about the ten percent of Eastern Europe who would be shipped east
into the gaping maw of the Gulag. In fact, FDR and most Democrats at
the time saw Stalin as a benign progressive ally. They had the same
lack of belief that the Gulag existed as they had about Hitler's death
camps. FDR never did one single thing or uttered one word of protest
about either. FDR had ignored Stalin's mass murder in the countryside
during the collectivization drive of the early thirties, the mass
arrests in the cities in the late thirties and the alliance with Hitler.
The
Yalta Treaty was a day of national humiliation for a nation that had
the only viable economy in the world and was near to testing nuclear
weapons. It cost us a half-century of Cold War.
Sixteen years later our country had elected an amphetamine-popping magazine-ad pretty boy
with
no experience doing anything substantial because of an impressive PR
campaign orchestrated by his gangster father. The first response from
Nikita Khrushchev to the election of this hapless effete Harvard
weakling was to build a wall between East and West Berlin, an action he
wouldnt dare take during Eisenhower's tenure. JFKs response was to fly
to Berlin and announce that he was a doughnut. That cringing weakness
encouraged the thug Khrushchev, who had been one of the clique of
gangsters who had murdered their boss when it looked like he was going
to conduct a purge against them, to become more aggressive and build
bases for nuclear-tipped missiles ninety miles away from us in Cuba.
The Air Force wanted to bomb the sites before they were operational.
That was too much for a weakling like JFK. He ordered the Navy to board
the missile-carrying ships and turn them around. In the subsequent
negotiations he
traded the
removal of US missiles from Turkey for the Soviet removal of the one's
in Cuba. We've been hearing about this humiliating show of weakness for
the last half-century, presented as the sole triumph of our fallen
Martyr.
But the fallen Martyr was replaced by LBJ, a protege of
FDR who dreamed of a new New Deal, The Great Society! The mess the
Kennedy brothers had created in Vietnam by conniving in the
assassination of the strongman Diem slowly exerted a gravitational
pull. Johnson dithered. The NVA and VC didnt respect the borders of
Laos and Cambodia but LBJ did. He always shrank from strong measures,
thinking he could bribe Ho Chi Minh into a negotiated settlement. When
the VC emerged from their ratholes to be slaughtered in the Tet
Offensive Johnson ignored his military, who wanted to follow up their
victory and end the war, and instead listened to the wimpish sniveling
of Walter Cronkite and the rest of the peacenik media and ordered the
army to go on the defensive while he dropped out of the presidential
race, called a bombing halt and pleaded for negotiations. That speech
that he gave that day in March was another national humiliation,
unnecessary and unearned, throwing away victory in a storm of self-pity
and cowardice fomented by another Democrat.
How can I catalog
the humiliations of the Carter Years? There are so many! The Canal
given away? The soulful kiss to Brezhnev in Vienna as they signed a
Salt II treaty that guaranteed Soviet superiority in Europe? His
refusal to stop the Cubans in their invasion of Katanga? His
endorsement of the Soviet-run bloodbath in the Horn Of Africa? His
cringingly weak response to their seizure of Afghanistan? No, when I
think of Jimmy The Jerk I see him cringing, trembling in the White
House, cowed by a tenth-rate Middle Eastern country who had violated
international law by taking everyone in our embassy there hostage. He
could have announced a B-52 strike to level the holy city of Qom in
seventy-two hours unless the hostages were released. The mullahs had
just purged the Air Force of all their Palevi-oriented pilots (all of
them) and had NO defenses of any sort. Instead of demanding the
hostages at the point of a gun Jimmy The Jerk decided, after months of
hand-wringing, to steal the hostages back from the mullahs. I remember
the humiliation that I felt as the sad story of our failed 'rescue
mission' was related on the news. It was a humiliation our entire
country felt.
You could say that Ford sitting idle while the NVA
violated the Paris Peace Accords was such a moment but his hands were
tied by a Democrat-dominated Congress determined to hand the South
Vietnamese over to slavery and death. Reagan not responding to the
attack in Beirut and Bush 41's refusal to destroy the Republican
Gaurds, both at the behest of Colin Powell, were equally humiliating
but both of those presidents had shown the will and the nerve to stand
up for our country's interests in most other areas and Reagan rebuilt
the military after the years of Congressional rule under the weaklings
Ford and Carter.
With BJ Clinton it was back to the national
humiliations we have come to expect of Democrats. These arent
misjudgments taken in response to bad advice like those of Reagan and
Bush, these are conscious decisions taken because their knowledge of
the nature of reality is flawed. The Clintonoids included a top
economic adviser who did her doctoral dissertation lauding the economic
system of Ceausescu's Romania. Clinton bugged out of Somalia after
eighteen Rangers were killed as a result of his trying to conduct that
operation on the cheap and in tandem with the incompetent UN. He
refused to take custody of Bin Laden when the Sudanese offered to
deliver him to US custody. His 'response' to the embassy bombings in
East Africa was so ineptly done and was so obviously driven by his need
to divert attention from his committing perjury on national television
that it enters the list of national humiliations along with BJ and The
Little Woman openly taking bribes from the Chicoms. The Great BJ
humiliation moment is when he stood in Tienanmen Square, scene of a
bloody massacre by the People's Liberation Army of people demanding
basic political rights, with his hand over his heart as that same
People's Liberation Army marched past.
But then there was Bush.
He was forced by events to stand up for his country. His reward from
the Democrats was rage. He was compared to Hitler. He was said to have
lied to invade a completely innocent nation that was no threat to us or
our interests. The Islamonazi opponents of our country were invited to
left-wing universities and lauded, even ones who openly admitted
oppressing women and executing homosexuals. Even if you take the
clownish attempts by Condi to roadmap the blood feud between the Arabs
and the Israelis Bush actually had a fairly strong foriegn policy. He
refused to participate in the idiocy of Global Warming, an attempt to
hobble the industrialized countries and transfer wealth to the
developing world.
But today our national humiliation is back on
track. Our President has made a speech in Cairo that should make
everyone stupid enough to have voted for a back-bench do-nothing first
term Senator, a radical who spouts the most errant nonsense as though
it is revealed truth, to hang their heads in sha

me.
To watch his facile butt-kissing to 'The Muslim World', assalaam
alykum, was to burn with shame. Barry mentioned that he was a
Christian, a Reverend Jeremiah Wright Christian of course, but then
waxed poetic about Islam in a way that should make anyone with any
knowledge of history raise an eyebrow. His family comes from a long
line of Muslims in East Africa, did they? And who were the Muslims in
East Africa? They were
slave traders thats who they were. Barry is proud that he comes from a long line of
slave traders! It
got worse. If you have any friends in Israel phone them up now and tell
them how much you care about them...they might not be around much
longer. He called for total Hamas control of the West Bank and Gaza;
for the Israelis to accept the right of Hamas to shoot missiles across
its border without response: for the right of Iran to nuclear power (so
it seems our enemies can drill for oil and build nuke plants and we're
stuck with a bunch of lousy windmills).
If you voted for this
pumpkin-headed 'student of history', every one of whose examples of
Islamic achievements were so wrong-headed as to be laughable, then
you're as ignorant as he is. This radical clap-trap in the interest of
sucking up to what the geniuses in Hillary's state department mistake
for some monolithic ethnic interest group,'The Moslem World', but what
is in fact a continental-sized, extremely diverse mass of ethnicities,
shows how ignorant and misguided the Obamunists are. What is the goal
of this nonsense? How does it advance our interests? Do they really
think the entire world is going to turn into a larger version of the
European Parliament? Isnt that a fundamental misunderstanding of human
nature and history?
If his knowledge of history doesnt include
any knowledge of the contribution of the Greeks to algebra, the Chinese
and Gutenberg's development of printing, and all the rest of the things
he got wrong in that passage about 'Muslim contributions' then you have
to wonder about the quality of the rest of his thinking. This part of
the speech sounded like a manifesto issued by some sophomore in
Political Science at Harvard, trying to get a 'B' in his Modern Ethnic
Studies class tau

ght
by a William Ayres-type dessicated sixties radical by making up phony
'achievements' for a favored ethnic group. Because of the education
they received these geniuses have the most screwed-up perspective on
the world that its possible to have. They're as ignorant as the
Clintonista who praised the Romanian economy in her dissertation and as
ignorant as the academics who awarded her a PhD for her efforts.
Everything they know is
wrong. And
you
elected them because Barry wasnt that ugly old Bush or that snarling
old McLame. He promised something new but he's turned out to be a
standard left-wing radical. Hugo Chavez is making jokes that him and
Fidel are to the right of Comrade Obama. But its not a joke. Barry is
what would have happened if Henry Wallace had been kept as Vice
President in 1944. He is what would have happened if Adlai had beat Ike.
One
more outrage. Women's Rights. Barry's take on this was that Pakistan,
Bangla Desh, and Indonesia all had had women presidents but the US
needs to struggle with women's equality! Of course, if it wasnt for him
we would be cursed with a woman president, and I still thank him for
that; but what did our Secretary Of State think of that passage? But
the implication is that we have a lot to learn about Women's Rights
from our new Muslim friends.
He made these remarks in a city where
young girls routinely have their clitoris removed without anesthetic by
the exacto-knife wielding local witch woman so that they wont be able
to feel sexual pleasure and disgrace their families in the eyes of God.
'Honor' killings and the killings of young wives for their dowries
happen all the time in Cairo. If a wife disagrees with her husband he
is within his legal rights to beat her as severly as he feels she
needs. He can divorce her in an instant any time he likes and keep 100%
of the marital assets and the children, who are his property, if he
wants them. Woman are not welcome in many public places without a male
relative accompanying them. Is Obama calling
this the direction we have to 'struggle' toward?
This
speech was a disgrace. Its a disgrace to the people who voted this
politically-correct ignoramus and his Ivy League crew of muddle-headed
Stalinists into power. The people who
cringed at every timid reference by Bush to Christianity are gushing with joy at 'assalaam alykum'-- a wish of Peace given only to
fellow Muslims!
So today we have another chapter in the national humiliation delivered
to our once-proud nation by a series of liberals. They've gotten
progressively worse until we have arrived at the bottom with Barry. He
praises savagely brutal systems and denigrates freedom in our own
country. He has put us under the thumb of the Chicoms by his reckless
spending and under the thumb of OPEC by his refusal to consider a
rational energy policy and now he's crawling to our enemies in the
pathetic hope that they'll '
like us'. I fear for my country.